Induced Relaxation Enhances the Cardiorespiratory Dynamics in COVID-19 Survivors.

Most COVID-19 survivors report experiencing at least one persistent symptom after recovery, including sympathovagal imbalance. Relaxation techniques based on slow-paced breathing have proven to be beneficial for cardiovascular and respiratory dynamics in healthy subjects and patients with various diseases. Therefore, the present study aimed to explore the cardiorespiratory dynamics by linear and nonlinear analysis of photoplethysmographic and respiratory time series on COVID-19 survivors under a psychophysiological assessment that includes slow-paced breathing. We analyzed photoplethysmographic and respiratory signals of 49 COVID-19 survivors to assess breathing rate variability (BRV), pulse rate variability (PRV), and pulse-respiration quotient (PRQ) during a psychophysiological assessment. Additionally, a comorbidity-based analysis was conducted to evaluate group changes. Our results indicate that all BRV indices significantly differed when performing slow-paced breathing. Nonlinear parameters of PRV were more appropriate for identifying changes in breathing patterns than linear indices. Furthermore, the mean and standard deviation of PRQ exhibited a significant increase while sample and fuzzy entropies decreased during diaphragmatic breathing. Thus, our findings suggest that slow-paced breathing may improve the cardiorespiratory dynamics of COVID-19 survivors in the short term by enhancing cardiorespiratory coupling via increased vagal activity.

Hemodynamic response to low-flow acute supplemental oxygen in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and elderly healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic response to supplemental oxygen in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is still not well known. OBJECTIVE: To determine and compare the effect of low-flow acute supplemental oxygen on the hemodynamics of IPF patients and matched healthy subjects. METHODS: Descriptive and comparative study in 20 IPF-patients and 19 Control-subjects, (60-80 years old) breathing ambient air followed by acute nasal low-flow (3 L/min) supplemental oxygen. Non-invasive methods were used during the supine position to evaluate oxygen saturation, heart rate, stroke volume index, cardiac output index, total peripheral resistance and arterial blood pressure. RESULTS: Breathing ambient air, IPF (vs. Control) presented lower values in stroke volume index (38.7 [29.4-43.2] vs. 45.4 [38.4-50.9] mL•kg-1•m2; p=0.009) and cardiac output index (2.484 [2.268 - 2.946] vs. 2.857 [2.628 - 3.054] L•min-1•m-2; p=0.028), with higher total peripheral resistance (1644 [1559-2076] vs. 1505 [1366-1784] dyne•s•cm-5; p=0.017). During supplemental oxygen (vs. ambient air), both groups increased oxygen saturation above 94% (p<0.001) while heart rate decreased about 6 to 8% (p<0.001); stroke volume index increased around 7% in the Control-group (p=0.004) but only 1% in the IPF-group (p=0.017). In addition, IPF showed increments in total peripheral resistance (1644 [1559-2076] vs. 1706 [1554-2278] dyne•s•cm-5; p=0.017) with subsequent decrements in cardiac output index (2.484 [2.268 - 2.946] vs. 2.362 [2.139 - 2.664] L•min-1•m-2; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Low-flow acute supplemental oxygen in IPF causes a meaningful decrement in cardiac output due to greater reduction in heart rate and increment in total peripheral resistance than matched healthy subjects. Knowing the hemodynamic profile of IPF patients may be helpful in determining their management with supplemental oxygen.